![arslanbeklord](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- Видео 9
- Просмотров 363 415
arslanbeklord
Добавлен 25 окт 2010
Өвөг Дээдсийн морин туурайгаар тамгалагдсан
Эх нутгийн минь газараас
Бурхан ирээд гуйсан ч атга шороо бүү өг.
Ойрд Монголын Их Хаан. Галданбошигт
Эх нутгийн минь газараас
Бурхан ирээд гуйсан ч атга шороо бүү өг.
Ойрд Монголын Их Хаан. Галданбошигт
Видео
Mongol Battle Strategy, Battle of Mohi Heath, 1241.flv
Просмотров 196 тыс.12 лет назад
From; For more great battles visit www.TheArtofBattle.com. It's like a museum. Except not boring. This animation covers the Battle of Mohi Heath, April 11, 1241. Red = Mongols Blue = Hungarians Animated and narrated by Jonathan Webb.
Mongolian all stars - Ugluu shig eh oron.flv
Просмотров 8 тыс.12 лет назад
Mongolian all stars - Ugluu shig eh oron
Mongolian Song- HARANGA Tolin Hul.flv
Просмотров 83 тыс.12 лет назад
Mongolian Song- HARANGA Tolin Hul.flv
Blue Mark _Khokh tolboton_ _Mongol OST_ - Altan Urag (Official video).mp4
Просмотров 1 тыс.12 лет назад
Altan Urag Mongolian Folk Rock Group_Blue Mark /Blue Spot/
7/11/2024
Moğol kardeşlerimiz.
This song sounds of horses. <3
Naranmunh mun vv suuld sum awj bga n
very poor anchor sound
Thanks
God shuu
I thought his name was Subutai.
Look's like blietzkrieg
I know it’s really really late but the Mongolian general name is actually subutai not subedei
At 1:52= when Hungarians were F'd
Dude, buy a mic
Hungarian had the same tactic of feigned attacks and retreats to hide the flanking attack with horse archers 300 years earlier when they pillaged the west ... but then they lost the battle at Lech (Augsburg) and most of their troops and after that the light cavalry was abandoned and they adapted the German style heavy cavalry. It was tragic that they lost to the same tactic they once mastered. The mongol invasion was stopped by Hungary that was practically destroyed in 1241 ... same way Hungary held up the Ottomans for 150 years until they were finally crushed at Vienna in 1683 and then gradually pushed out of Europe. Hungary was the shield that protected Europe and civilization and when the time came after WW1 for Europe to remember this they threw Hungary in the gutter.
What software do you use to animate these videos?
powerpoint
This video has World's most irritating voice
Sounds like you got the wrong job, you're not enjoying what you're doing. 're
hi\
Subedei is Turkic Commander: )
Can Uysal stupid
Gg Bambar Lol Subedei is Tatar and I m Tatar Turks
1.You are not Turkic you are shit of Oghuz,2.Subeedei is Mongolic general
Munkhbayar Sainjargal I m not Oghuz I m crimean Tatar Subedei is Tuva Turks
He is not Turk,He was Uriankhai clan of Mongol not Turk ! all is turk for you ?
hey pepole dont just FUCKING HATE MONGOLIA BECAUSE THEY JUST VERY STRONG AND SMART AND THEY LIVE IN VERY COLD PLACE TO LIVE SO THEY ARE STRONG OK.
This is total bullshit the medieval hungarian army couldn't produce more then 50 000 at the high og it's peak in the 1400... King Bela only had 20 000 or less soldiers with him in Muhi. THe mongol army was 100 000 strong when they started invading Poland and Hungary.
all these info came from their enemies. the mongols never recorded anything except one, the secret history of the mongols.
Actually this tactics and strategies are being taught in West Point and US Naval War College.
Jun Laxa It was first applied by Hannibal of Carthage against Rome.
selim996 I agree with you. I’m just saying that it is so effective that the basic was adopted by the US and teach it to American Military School.
When you think about it, Eastern Europe was constantly under attacks from Asia (Huns, Avars, Magyars, Mongols, Turks, etc...) due to its wide open space. Being constantly chased means being poor.
Not Mohi, Muhi
hi
subutai was the greatest general of genghis khan he fought in 65 battle field and never been defeated
Well I agree on the first thing you said but he lost a number of battles were he retreated rather then being killed
He technically did lose some battles but they were just tactical retreats to either bait the enemy to chase him into a trap or come back stronger than ever.
Mongolians 20.000 vs 80.000 Hungarians ... Subedei is best general
Can anyone translate the lyric of the song in Chinese?
Everything considered, Subetei is lucky he did not face a more experienced commander with better trained troops.. Alexander would not have made the same mistakes.
The Hungarian General did his best, but was let down by his untrained troops, trying to flee which Alexander would never have permitted. In fact, Alexander would have: 1. Sent out scouts to check both for the enemy and more importantly to guard the river, 2. He would never have concentrated all his troops in a tight, enclosed area, and 3. If trapped in a defensive position would have again concentrated on breaking through the encirclement, probably with all his cavalry. Bottom line, generalship is not about numbers or weapons but about instinctively realizing what the enemy is up to, where his vulnerabilities are and taking advantage of them. Plus you must always control your troops.
but still there is many holes in that strategy its not easy to suspect that enemy split their troop in two group even by sending scouts cuz there was big distance from each group and like i said before it was an ambush and secondly what defensive position could have been better okay the famous wedge position of Alexander in front phalanx and then heavy cavalry but remember the Mongol army specialized with armor-piercing arrows and also catapults as mention in video they can easily adjust in any position so they will crush the very first section which is the most important part of the enemies army Alexander is very smart man so might scatter his strong troops from arrows and boulders but it will lead to disaster obviously, but if he tries to break the siege by all his force then other Mongol army will backfire him from behind, Mongol army use terror by making dummies on horse so they army would look much bigger so Alexander might get problem since he will try to find weak or strong spot and Mongols can easily retreat their group of soldiers which Alexander choose to break and they can make illusion of defeat and by this method they can easily make their enemy in their favorable position to ambush, Its the main and tricky strategic of Mongol army.
He invaded old Russia in winter, the Khwarezmia Islamic empire, the Xi Xia and the Jins of China which were the most advanced military forces of their days. Hungary and Europe were minor league in comparison.
Kenneth N. Shortlidge lol alexander had mostly just infantry his army would be divided and crushed by the out speeding, out flanking, out manuvering army and made up of mixed cavalry, even worse this battle was during night time.
+MultiDEVILMAYCRY123 Read up on the Battle of Jaxartes, Alexander was no fool, he understood the fighting styles of the nomadic cavalry.
Everything considered, Subetei is lucky he did not face a more experienced commander with better trained troops.. Alexander would not have made the same mistakes.
Kenneth N. Shortlidge lol no, where do you think the nazis got the blitzkrieg from.
Great content, nice channel o/
I believe there's more to it than just subadia dieing. I think the monghols loses were to great to continually assault western europe
downes people are good tacticians
WELL DEMONSTRATED. THANK YOU GARE
Curse you China! If you had better men guarding the great wall, the filthy barbarian would have no choice but to stew in their frustration on the other side.
The Great Wall measures just over 13000 miles long. They went around it. It did not matter if the Wall had guards or not. A modern day tank battalion might be able to do 150 miles a day. A Mongol army was able to travel 100 miles a day. And they force marched their horses. They were a professional army. Not merely barbarians.
cavalry. not calvalry. not like a museum and it's boring. remedial reading slide show.
GG ez for Mongolia :)
As the Hungarians I would have committed part of the army to hold the bridge while I focused all of my attention on one of the armies crossing the river with speed and determination, after having completely eliminated them, I would have then focused my attention on the remaining mongol forces and wiped them out. Hungarians fucked up, but I assume they weren't so proficient in warfare as the Mongols.
The Hungarians didn't know the Mongols were fording the river in other locations. They didn't have this graphic that showed them how the enemy was maneuvering at every step. It's easy to be a general when you have perfect information.
Okay fine, I will take back my earlier criticism, but still... even though they had no way of knowing where the mongols were going to appear from, couldn't they have made fortifications? The Romans used to make fortifications all the time, for example Caesar with his battle against vercingetorix, he made himself well fortified, and he did not make one fortification, but two, from the front and back. I am sure the Hungarian nobles or army commanders must have studied some history about warfare, otherwise wtf?
First, this is a battle, at most you can make makeshift fortications, like trenches, spikes and palisades. In Caesar's case againt Vercingetorix he was laying a siege, so he had a lot more time to build. Another big difference is Roman armies were professional soldiers, he had pretty well trained soldiers in all manners of warfare not just the fighting, so they were well versed in foraging and building campaign structures. In this battle, most of the hungarian army, as most medieval armies were levied troops who can't match the structure of campaigning of a professional roman army. And last, leaving freedom of movement against the mongols was exactly their plan, they had siege weapons and were mostly a mobile and ranged force, so campaign structures would be mostly detrimental to the hungarians, because they would just be sitting ducks (as in fact they were in their encirclement).
Alright, I guess i spoke to soon, pretty much the Hungarians were fucked from the get-go. Was there a possibility the Hungarians could have won?
What are the sources for this information?
Since when do hungarians not use horse archers XD
Huns in Hungary come from the same steppes as the mongols but during this era, they abandoned the old ways because of Christian views. They became knight and such.
But the huns are no relatives of mongols. Huns are descendants of a Turkic nomadic tribe. There native land around the Ural. Then they invaded present-day hungary and settled there by Attila the Hun
Original Huns were Mongols. But the Attila Huns are a new nation formed from emigrant Mongolian Huns and a Central Asian Nation Kangui. Kangui was East Iranion nation.
only Hungary's name its related to huns because they ocupied that teritory for a time. the hungarian ppl are totaly different from the fino-ugric tribes
Huns and hungarians have little in common but the name somehow sounds related
The Mongol tactics were amazing... that's how they conquered the world. Most of the people think that they simply flooded every battle with huge numbers. Not the case, in most of them they were in inferiority. That "escape path" was used with great effect in many battles. Anyway, there is an ongoing discussion of why the Mongols left Hungary.. because they never actually reached as far back as Mongolia. As for the beginning, it's far from certain they could have conquered all of Europe, at least not immediately. The Western Europe was far more fortified.... it would have taken a lot of time to conquer each fort and city. Not to mention that they really did lose a battle in Central Europe.
Forts only require time to siege and starve out the defenders. The terror tactic of annihilating an entire city would've caused many cities/forts to surrender. The Mongols had to be removed from the field, in another words, crushed in battle. Given their track record and the fact that the Mongols destroyed far more powerful, populous, wealthy and technologically advanced civilizations gives little reason to think that all of Europe would not be conquered.
Mogol at that time was supper power, only defeated 3 times in Vietnam and 2 times in Japan
Mongols highly experienced in siege warfare too.
It was a song a very good song ... my song was .....
toriin duulal bologchimoor sanagdaj bnashuu hahha
do you have a source for the golden bridge tactic? I'd like to know
M Li read subedai the valiant
Saihan saihan 👌
I'm watching this cus of battle of the bastards... Didn't realize how Interesting this stuff was.
Battle of the bastards was a yoke. "Lets fire arrows into my own troops so they build a wall of dead people which I can use in my advantage."
Don't mention that battle. Jon Snow is so stupid as a battle commander, playing right into Ramsay's hands.. Sansa is idiotic for not mentioning that lots of cavalry reinforcements were on their way - knowing this beforehand could have saved thousands of lives. And why didn't they arm the giant with a tree or a club! That would have made him so much more effective against pikemen.
StillRooney the mongols vs noobs.
Needs some background music. Needs a less depressed lace voice over. pacing could be better. All in all I liked it.
that count is fucked up! Subetei had 20,000
Yes, they had 20, maybe 30, while Hungarians had as few as 4000 -10000 men, numbers are inflated in this video.
yours is wrong too.
+Gerelmaa Sergelen wtf!?!
Eric Methew you are thinking of tsubodais raids into Georgia and Russia. The battle of kalka river when his two tumans took on 80 thousand Russians. No this battle happened 20 years later and was more even in numbers. Maybe 4 tumans and 50 thousand Hungarian Europeans
what the hungarians should have done is cut off all choke points. Mongol horse archers are devistating in open fields as they can simply run if a charge starts, and move in when a route is present. What horse archers suck at however is taking vital objective points. Think about it, if the horse archers prime directive is to run away when attacked then they do not advance very fast, if at all. closing the choke points would mean the hungarians could hold off almost indefinately as long as their shields were thick and their archers were true.
If it were me, the second I got word that we were flanked I would have immediately pushed my whole force over the bridge and position my men along the river to make sure they wouldn't be able to ford it again without being shit on by artillery/arrows.
Hungarian are good warriors. They should have never defended the poles.
max radke It would not work because no army in the 11th century was capable of out maneuvering mongolian troops. Each mongolian troop had 4 to 5 horses with them, which means no ground troop, only cavalry archers that are very deadly and fast.
Subetei is Worlds best generel. He's never lose
I would still take the epic general Khalid bin waleed over him